By Cernig Gen Musharraf has called Washington and London's bluff, knowing they have no option but to back him. In launching what is, in effect, his second military coup in eight years, the general has exposed the impotence of the US and Britain to control a key ally with nuclear weapons. With troops on the ground in Afghanistan, and the military situation in Nato's war against the Taliban and al-Qaida delicately poised, the US cannot make more than faint bleating noises when its key ally across the border buries democracy for the foreseeable future. Condoleezza Rice said last night that Washington was reviewing the aid package to Pakistan, but the options of the US secretary of state are limited - if, that is, she wants Pakistan's army to continue its costly campaign in Waziristan. The American empire, if there is such a thing, is only just coming to terms with the fact that one of its pro-consuls has gone awol.Still, Bhutto hits the facts well enough in her op-ed for CNN today, a plea aimed at America-at-large in which she implicitly accuses Musharraf's regime of being behind the recent attempt to kill her. I have long claimed that the rise of extremism and militancy in Pakistan could not happen without support from elements within the current administration. My return to my country poses a threat to the forces of extremism that have thrived under a dictatorship. They want to stop the restoration of democracy at any price. They have exploited a poor, desperate, and powerless people and allowed extremists the right environment in which to flourish.All this really is the heart of the con game Musharraf has been playing all these years - his own regime is the direction and funding force behind the very terrorists he's meant to be fighting. The only "terrorists" he ever rounds up are those who got too big for their britches and decided to assert some self-control. As long as the extremists do his regime's bidding, they are safe, coddled and protected. The Bush administration can hardly be unaware of this - after all, they've been told it often enough by the Afghani government, Indian intelligence and their own NATO allies. But a seeming ally plays better, and creates more opportunity for fear-mongering rather than actual real and present danger - all to the domestic political good. Which, of course, begs the question of why Bhutto was ever negotiating with Musharraf in the first place. Former UK ambassador Craig Murray provides a concise answer: It has to be said that, with very few exceptions, Pakistan's leading democratic politicians are, and always have been, a venal shower. But being clear eyed about that in no way justifies Musharraf's desperate attempt to extend his power.An attempt that will succeeed. Speculation about any possible replacement for Musharraf ignores the obvious - he isn't going to be replaced. The heir-apparent appears to be General Musharraf's appointee as his second-in-command of the military. He's a Musharraf loyalist who was formerly head of the ISI. The simple truth here is that Musharraf cannot be toppled except by the army, and he has ensured the army will not do so. Update No, I don't believe today's statement from Pakistan that the January elections will go ahead as planned, after yesterday's announcement that they would be indefinitely delayed. General Musharraf was meant to be out of uniform by now - another broken promise. The man's word is worth nothing. Update 2 Musharaff has had arrested at least 2,000 - quite possibly as many as 3,500 - political dissidents, mostly middle-class lawyers and mostly using brutal methods already. He's being quite clear about his aims and they have nothing to do with fighting Islamic extremists. Under intense pressure from the United States and other Western allies to hold elections as scheduled in January, Musharraf said Monday he would relinquish control of the military and return the country to ``the same track as we were moving'' but he gave no indication when the vote would take place.Congratulations to the Dutch, who are the first nation to declare they will cut off aid to the Pakistani dictator. |
Monday, November 05, 2007
The AWOL Pro-Consul (Updated)
Posted by
Cernig
at
11/05/2007 04:55:00 PM
Labels: Bush administration, Foreign Policy, Military, Pakistan, Pony Plans, Rule of Law, Spin/Flim Flam, Totalitarianism, War on Terror
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)


|