Here's another example of how simplistic and linear narratives - which are the Right's preferred style, they call it "message discipline" - don't do justice to complex situations and actually lead to policy failures. From The Guardian this morning:
A grand coalition of anti-government forces is planning a second Iranian revolution via the ballot box to deny President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad another term in office and break the grip of what they call the "militia state" on public life and personal freedom.But the Bush administration and it's cheereladers will continue to make the mistake of treating the entire Iranian political establishment as monolithically evil - which leads to idiocy like backing the Mujahedeen e-Kalq as their "best" hope for regime change.
Encouraged by recent successes in local elections, opposition factions, democracy activists, and pro-reform clerics say they will bring together progressive parties loyal to former president Mohammad Khatami with so-called pragmatic conservatives led by Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani.
The alliance aims to exploit the president's deepening unpopularity, borne of high unemployment, rising inflation and a looming crisis over petrol prices and possible rationing to win control of the Majlis in general elections which are due within 10 months.
Parliament last week voted to curtail Mr Ahmadinejad's term by holding presidential and parliamentary elections simultaneously next year.
Though the move is likely to be vetoed by the hardline Guardian Council, it served notice of mounting disaffection in parliament.
But opposition spokesmen say their broader objective is to bring down the fundamentalist regime by democratic means, transform Iran into a "normal country", and obviate the need for any military or other US and western intervention. Rightwing political and religious forces, divided and dismayed by Mr Ahmadinejad's much-criticised performance, are already mobilising to meet the threat.
The movement amounts to the clearest sign yet within Iran that the country is by no means unified behind a president who has led it into confrontation with the west over the nuclear issue, while presiding over economic decline at home.
No comments:
Post a Comment