You know, that one doesn't need any extra snark - it speaks volumes about supporting the troops the GOP way all on its own.
More and more very senior whistleblowers are coming forward with nasty truths about Bush's team of little leaguers. Someone should keep a list of them all and their revelations, a "whistleblowercentral.com", otherwise each will be counterspun piecemeal. Are we really expected to believe that every single one is mentally unstable and making things up because they have a grudge against the Presididn't?
Hang on...here's another neocon stooge only this one says the Russians moved them to Syria! By truck and ship no less, and in 2003. That contradicts evangelist wingnut Bill Tierney's story and also the fabrications of Georges Sada. As Oilver Willis says in a great debunk of Tierney et al, "when the facts don’t line up with the rhetoric, you change the facts".
The trouble is, they've changed the facts so many times they can't keep the lies in line anymore...like 12 year olds getting caught not doing their homework.
Neoconservatism, whatever its complex roots, has become indelibly associated with concepts like coercive regime change, unilateralism and American hegemony. What is needed now are new ideas, neither neoconservative nor realist, for how America is to relate to the rest of the world — ideas that retain the neoconservative belief in the universality of human rights, but without its illusions about the efficacy of American power and hegemony to bring these ends about.
This from a man who was a signator to the Statement of Principles from The Project For The New American Century back in 1997!
He ends: The correct response to this is not more triumphalism and spin, but a real sense of shame and sorrow that so many have died because of errors made by their superiors, and by intellectuals like me. Well said.
Can we now finally have enough of idiots like Victor Davis Hanson linking Iran to Al Qaida?
Although Shiite Hizbullah has very good relations with Sunni organisations, such as the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, it perceives Al-Zarqawi's organisation, which so far has killed hundreds of Shiites in Iraq, as a threat. "We do not have any relationship with that group. They are working toward tearing the Islamic Nation apart, dividing Muslims into numerous sects and mutilating the face of Islam," Afif Naboulsi, Hizbullah's director of media relations, told the Lebanese Daily Star.
Iran, which seems to be one of Hizbullah's primary backers, is run by a Shiite theocracy. Clear enough for the wingnuts, do you think?
Unfortunately, there's a problem here. American reporters adhere to a simple rule: The words "permanent," "bases," and "Iraq" should never be placed in the same sentence, not even in the same paragraph; in fact, not even in the same news report.
According to the report, the decision followed similar moves by leaders of Maysan and Basra provinces, which have frozen ties with British forces in southern Iraq. It continues: "The Karbala council is controlled by the Supreme Council of Islamic Revolution in Iraq, the country's largest Shiite party, and Dawa, the party of Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari." I believe Maysan and Basra are similiarly controlled.
Oh shit.
No comments:
Post a Comment